Laissez-Faire Capitalism Should Be as Dead as Soviet Communism

By this read Ms Huffington hasn't the slightest clue of how capitalism or the free market is supposed to work. Arianna seems to believe that the market place can successfully be over regulated and be considered the free market at the same time. Sorry but the two are NOT conducive to one another. A free market would allow the consumer to determine which cars manufacturered are the ones they want to purchase, but government long ago took that option from Detriot. Remember the muscle car era ?? It was under Carter that the stripping of horsepower occured, the EPA brought in the cataylic convertor which once more stripped a motor of even more horsepower. I could continu this list but a free market economy as we know it has too many governmental guidelines.

You'll notice in the article how she tries to tie the Bush Administration to the failure in the housing market, however she ignores the portion from Carter onward where government regulators convinced the lenders to move loans into a sector of the economy where they had not gone before. People were allowed to borrow money when they clearly had not the capacity to pay it back. It was all done in pursuit of the American Dream and home ownership. Once more government was allowed to reek havoc in a sector where it should have stayed out of.

December 23, 2008

Laissez-Faire Capitalism Should Be as Dead as Soviet Communism

By Arianna Huffington

The collapse of Communism as a political system sounded the death knell for Marxism as an ideology. But while laissez-faire capitalism has been a monumental failure in practice, and soundly defeated at the polls, the ideology is still alive and kicking.

The only place you can find an American Marxist these days is teaching a college linguistic theory class. But you can find all manner of free market fundamentalists still on the Senate floor or in Governor's mansions or showing up on TV trying to peddle the deregulation snake oil.

Take Sen. John Ensign, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, who went on Face the Nation and, with a straight face, said of the economic meltdown: "Unfortunately, it was allowed to be portrayed that this was a result of deregulation, when in fact it was a result of overregulation."

Or Gov. Mark Sanford, who told Joe Scarborough he was against bailing out the auto industry because it would "threaten the very market-based system that has created the wealth that this country has enjoyed."

If a politician announced he was running on a platform of "from each according to his ability, to each according to his need" he would be laughed off the stage. That is also the correct response to anyone who continues to make the case that markets do best when left alone.

It's time to drive the final nail into the coffin of laissez-faire capitalism by treating it like the discredited ideology it inarguably is. If not, the Dr. Frankensteins of the right will surely try to revive the monster and send it marauding through our economy once again.

We've only just begun to bury the financially dead, and the free market fundamentalists are already looking to deflect the blame.

In a comprehensive piece on what led to the mortgage crisis and the subsequent financial meltdown, the New York Times shows how the Bush administration's devotion to unregulated markets was a primary cause of our economy to ruin. But the otherwise fascinating piece puts too much focus on the "mistakes" the Bush team made by not paying attention to the warning signs popping up all around them.

"There is no question we did not recognize the severity of the problems," claimed Al Hubbard, Bush's former chief economic adviser. "Had we, we would have attacked them."

But the mistake wasn't in not recognizing the "severity of the problems" -- the mistake was the ideology that led to the problems. Communism didn't fail because Soviet leaders didn't execute it well enough. Same with free market fundamentalism. In fact, Bush and his team did a bang-up job executing a defective theory. The problem wasn't just the bathwater; the baby itself is rotten to the core.

William Seidman, the longtime GOP economic advisor who oversaw the S&L bailout in 1991, cuts to the chase: "This administration made decisions that allowed the free market to operate as a barroom brawl instead of a prize fight. To make the market work well, you have to have a lot of rules."

Even Alan Greenspan, whose owl-eyed visage would adorn a Mount Rushmore of unregulated capitalists, has begun to see the light, telling a House committee in October that he "made a mistake in presuming that the self-interests of organizations, specifically banks and others, were such that they were best capable of protecting their own shareholders and their equity in the firms."

But most Republicans are still refusing to see what's right in front of them. Especially Bush, our CEO president, who lays the blame not on the failures of the marketplace but on past administrations and corporate greed. "Wall Street got drunk," he says. Maybe so, but who made the last 8 years Happy Hour, and kept serving up the drinks?

Last week, Ben Smith reported that the GOP was launching "a new, in-house think tank aimed at reviving the party's policy heft." In a private memo explaining the think tank, RNC chairman Mike Duncan wrote: "We must show how our ideology can be applied to solve problems." But, of course, it's that very ideology that's causing the problems. It's like the old horror movie cliché: "We've traced the call -- it's coming from inside the house!"

We've got to do everything we can to make sure there will be no sequels to this political horror. The blame shifters cannot be allowed to make their case without the truth being pointed out at every turn. It's time to relegate free market fundamentalists to the same standing as Marxist ideologues: intellectual curiosities occasionally trotted out as relics of a failed philosophy.

Arianna Huffington is co-founder and editor-in-chief of The Huffington Post.

it's time

With the impending monetary problems in this nation the federal government needs to take a step back and allow for businesses to fail, No matter what the outcome might be. We as a nation have to be educated to live within our means and this goes for the individual, the businesses and the government, especially the government. It is bad enough that I have my own personal debt that I have to manage, but through time I have others managing debt for me which compounds my debt exponentially.

On an earlier blog I wrote about Ronald Reagan's administration bailing out Chrysler and Harley Davidson with taxpayer money which just compounded our national debt but there are others as well. The S & L scandal cost the taxpayers millions while the bailout of Lockheed back in 1971 done much the same. We now have the multi million dollar bailout of a government entity known as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because loans were given to individuals that could barely afford them.

Government involvement back in 1929 took a depression into what we now know as the Great Depression. Banks should have sought out mergers and buyouts instead of government bailouts.
Are we headed for another Great Depression, all I can do is suggest that you stock up on cheap food now as the cost are going to sky rocket in the near future. We haven't seen the worst of it and government on all levels has played a HUGE impact on what is going to occur.